Talk:Tears of a Lamb
Appearance
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Dank (talk · contribs) on 18 May 2009 with the comment: A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Tears of a Lamb – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. It was contested by 159.182.1.4 (talk · contribs) on 2009-05-18 with the comment: Translated into multiple languages, published in multiple countries |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Deletion?
[edit]I downgraded this from speedy deletion to a 7-day proposed deletion. The Google news archives link gave two possibly useful hits; I am adding them because we have nothing better, and I'm asking at WP:ANIME for advice. Any wikiprojects that have tagged this talk page can get notice of this proposed deletion through WP:Article alerts. - Dank (push to talk) 15:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Vol 1Vol 3 Pop Culture Shock
- One more RS review from another source and i think it will pass WP:BK until then it can be challenged --KrebMarkt 06:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Done Clara Yamasaka wrote a review that was published in Newtype USA Vol. 7 No. 1 page 105. – allen四names 05:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)